Tag Archives: supreme court decision

The History Of Jim Crow


Through this vehicle, Thought Provoking Perspectives, I write about issues concerning and pertaining to the African American Diaspora. I do so with the intent to empower those who either don’t know our history or have forgotten it. My goal is simple: I believe our history is American History and is “The Greatest Story Ever Told” – although much of it has been erased, and most of is hidden factually.

For example, most people don’t know who Jim Crow was or how this name became synonymous with racism akin to Apartheid. I thought we’d buried Jim Crow, but I’ve come to realize that is not the case. He is alive and well, living though his son, James E. Crow, Esq., is who we see today! If you follow the current political environment, you have met him and know him well. Just listen to the renewed version of the Citizens Counsel represented by the Republicans and the Tea Party types, and you will see that the apartheid version of America’s sorted past. But I digress!

Let me explain where the term Jim Crow came from for those who don’t know! The term originated in a song performed by Daddy Rice, a white minstrel show entertainer in the 1830’s. Rice covered his face with charcoal paste or burnt cork to resemble a black man as he sang and danced a routine in the caricature of a silly black person. By the 1850s, this cruelly belittling blackface character, one of several stereotypical images of black inferiority in America’s popular culture, was a standard act in minstrel shows of the day.

The term became synonymous with the wicked concept of segregation directed specifically toward African Americans in the late nineteenth-century. It is not clear why this term was selected. However, what is clear is by 1900, the term was generally identified with those racist laws and actions that deprived African Americans of their civil rights by defining blacks as inferior to whites while identifying them as subordinate people.

It was around this time that its inception entered the lexicon of racial bigotry after the landmark U.S Supreme Court decision Plessy v Ferguson in 1896 resulting from a suit brought by the New Orleans Committee of Citizens. The notion was devised as many southern states tried to thwart the efforts and gains made during Reconstruction following the Civil War.

They, the Committee of Citizens, arranged for Homer Plessy’s arrest in order to challenge Louisiana’s segregation laws. Their argument was, “We, as freemen, still believe that we were right, and our cause is sacred” referring to the Confederacy. The Supreme Court agreed, and a policy of segregation became the law of the land lasting more than sixty years as a result of that crucial decision.

As a result of reconstruction, African Americans were able to make great progress in building their own institutions, passing civil rights laws, and electing officials to public office. In response to these achievements, southern whites launched a vicious, illegal war against southern blacks and their white allies. In most places, whites carried out this war under the cover of secret organizations such as the KKK. Thousands of African Americans were killed, brutalized, and terrorized in these bloody years. I might add that anywhere south of Canada was “South” as this was the law of the land.

The federal government attempted to stop the bloodshed by sending in troops and holding investigations, but its efforts were far too limited and frankly were not intended to solve the problem. Therefore, black resistance to segregation was difficult because the system of land tenancy, known as sharecropping, left most blacks economically dependent upon planter/landlords and merchant suppliers. In addition, white terror at the hands of lynch mobs threatened all members of the black family – adults and children alike. This reality made it nearly impossible for blacks to stand up to Jim Crow laws because such actions might bring the wrath of the white mob on one’s parents, brothers, spouse, and children.

Few black families were economically well off enough to buck the local white power structure of banks, merchants, and landlords. To put it succinctly: impoverished and often illiterate Southern blacks were in a weak position to confront the racist culture of Jim Crow. To enforce the new legal order of segregation, Southern whites often resorted to even more brutalizing acts of mob terror; including race riots and ritualized lynchings were regularly practiced to enforce this agenda.

Some historians saw this extremely brutal, and near epidemic commitment to white supremacy, as breaking with the South’s more laissez-faire and paternalistic past. Others view this “new order” as a more rigid continuation of the “cult of whiteness” at work in the South since the end of the Civil War. Both perspectives agree that the 1890’s ushered in a more formally racist South and one in which white supremacists used law and mob terror to define the life and popular culture of African American people as an inferior people.

I want you to remember that words have meaning and power. As we witness current events today from the States Rights folks from the right-wing so-called conservatives, you can clearly see the resurrection of Jim Crow through his son James E. Crow, Esq. speak to the so-called real Americans and those who want to take back their country. “History is known and has repeated itself – and if we can’t remember, it will reappear”! And that’s my Thought Provoking Perspective…

%d bloggers like this: